Skip to content
Franke IP Information
IP LAW AND PRACTICE
Franke IP Information
  • Home
  • Authors
  • Contact
  • Legal Notice
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
← OHIM: New Website Goes Online!
EPO: Abolition of Established and Efficient Safety Mechanisms for Users →

Happy New Year 2014!

Posted on January 1, 2014 by Dr. Dirk Franke

We wish a Happy and prosperous New Year to all our readers!

Silvester

Photo: © matze_ott, [CC BY 2.0]

This entry was posted in Christmas Greetings. Bookmark the permalink.
← OHIM: New Website Goes Online!
EPO: Abolition of Established and Efficient Safety Mechanisms for Users →
  • Follow Us on LinkedInFollow Us on RSS
  • Recent Posts

    • Patent Protection in the Netherlands: The Registration Patent, the PCT Gap, and a Reform on the Horizon
    • Can Relevant Prior Art Be “Hidden” Behind the Closest Prior Art?
    • The Quiet Cost Creep: How the EPO Has Multiplied Its Fees, Step by Step, in Recent Years
    • When the Description Reads Along: G 1/24, AI-Assisted Drafting, and the Firm’s New Liability Risk
    • No Property, No Innovation: Why Socialist Patent Systems Forfeit Prosperity – The USSR, the GDR and Cuba
    • Who Survives AI? Partners, Associates and Freelance Patent Attorneys in a Shifting Firm Structure
    • When the Patent Office Costs More Than the Attorney: Two Scenarios for the Future of the IP Industry in the Age of Artificial Intelligence
  • Recent Comments

    • Kiara on German Patent and Trade Mark Office: The German Trade Mark Law Modernization Act (MaMoG) took effect on January 14, 2019
    • Vicky Varshney on Moldova: Validation Agreement Enters into Force
    • Gayathri on German Patent and Trade Mark Office: The German Trade Mark Law Modernization Act (MaMoG) took effect on January 14, 2019
    • Dr. Dirk Franke on Cambodia: Validation Agreement Enters into Force
    • Dr. Dirk Franke on Moldova: Validation Agreement Enters into Force
  • Archives

    • July 2026 (8)
    • June 2026 (15)
    • December 2024 (1)
    • November 2023 (1)
    • June 2023 (1)
    • January 2023 (1)
    • May 2022 (1)
    • April 2022 (1)
    • January 2022 (1)
    • December 2020 (1)
    • November 2020 (1)
    • April 2020 (1)
    • January 2020 (1)
    • March 2019 (1)
    • December 2018 (1)
    • December 2017 (1)
    • March 2017 (1)
    • December 2016 (1)
    • June 2016 (2)
    • March 2016 (1)
    • January 2016 (2)
    • December 2015 (1)
    • August 2015 (2)
    • July 2015 (1)
    • June 2015 (1)
    • March 2015 (2)
    • January 2015 (1)
    • December 2014 (1)
    • August 2014 (1)
    • July 2014 (2)
    • March 2014 (2)
    • January 2014 (1)
    • December 2013 (1)
    • November 2013 (1)
    • October 2013 (7)
  • Categories

    • Christmas Greetings
    • Design Law
    • Employee
    • European Law
    • German law
    • International Law
    • Patent Law
    • Search Tools
    • Start-up Business Consulting
    • Trademark Law
  • Bookmarks

    • Franke IP Information (German)
    • subscribe to RSS feed
  • Tags

    • AI
    • Algeria
    • black and white trademark
    • Brexit
    • colored trademark
    • common practice
    • Depatisnet
    • design search
    • divisional application
    • EPC
    • EPO
    • espacenet
    • EUIPO
    • European divisional application
    • European patent application
    • European patent office
    • European Union
    • EU trademark
    • freedom-to-operate analyse
    • GPTO
    • international trademark registration
    • interview with inventors
    • invalidity search
    • Invention
    • inventor interview
    • Madrid Agreement
    • Madrid Protocol
    • Madrid System
    • MM1 form
    • Nice classification
    • OHIM
    • patent law
    • patent search
    • prior art search
    • Research landscape
    • ROMARIN
    • rule 36 EPC
    • search tools
    • TESS
    • trademark search
    • Unified Patent Court
    • unitary patent
    • UPC
    • validation
    • WIPO
  • RSS Franke IP Information (German)

    • Patentschutz in den Niederlanden: Eintragungspatent, PCT-Lücke und eine bevorstehende Reform
    • Lässt sich relevanter Stand der Technik hinter dem nächstliegenden Stand der Technik „verstecken“?
    • Die stille Teuerung: Wie das EPA seine Gebühren in den letzten Jahren schrittweise vervielfacht hat
    • Wenn die Beschreibung mitliest: G 1/24, KI-gestützte Ausarbeitung und das neue Haftungsrisiko der Kanzlei
    • Kein Eigentum, keine Innovation: Warum sozialistische Patentsysteme Wohlstand verschenken – UdSSR, DDR und Kuba
    • Wer überlebt die KI? Partner, Associates und freie Patentanwälte im Umbruch der Kanzleistruktur
    • Wenn das Patentamt teurer wird als der Anwalt: Zwei Szenarien für die Zukunt der IP-Branche im Zeitalter der Künstlichen Intelligenz
    • Lässt sich ein Forschungsstandort auf Pump retten? Schulden, Steuern und Bürokratie aus Startup-Sicht
    • Verliert Deutschland den Anschluss? Was 125 Jahre Nobelpreise über den Forschungsstandort verraten
    • Namensänderung bei Inhabern und Anmeldern von Schutzrechten
Franke IP Information
Proudly powered by WordPress.